<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook and Privacy Changes (Long Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brianrowe.org/IMT550/2010/01/31/facebook-and-privacy-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brianrowe.org/IMT550/2010/01/31/facebook-and-privacy-changes/</link>
	<description>Class Blog for IMT 550, Winter 2010, @ UW Ischool</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KAtesci</title>
		<link>http://brianrowe.org/IMT550/2010/01/31/facebook-and-privacy-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>KAtesci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianrowe.org/IMT550/?p=197#comment-73</guid>
		<description>It is not affecting my usage of facebook, that is for sure. I am actually taking advantage of this feature by providing a link to my profile on my website (I was doing it even before reading those blog posts).

However, there seems like there are a bunch of other people who are not happy with this act. And, I am with them. The point that I wanted get across was that users is what brought facebook to these days and the favor shouldn&#039;t be returned this way. Especially since privacy has become a very touchy subject these days.

Some personal examples of unhappy users can be found in the source blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not affecting my usage of facebook, that is for sure. I am actually taking advantage of this feature by providing a link to my profile on my website (I was doing it even before reading those blog posts).</p>
<p>However, there seems like there are a bunch of other people who are not happy with this act. And, I am with them. The point that I wanted get across was that users is what brought facebook to these days and the favor shouldn&#8217;t be returned this way. Especially since privacy has become a very touchy subject these days.</p>
<p>Some personal examples of unhappy users can be found in the source blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://brianrowe.org/IMT550/2010/01/31/facebook-and-privacy-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianrowe.org/IMT550/?p=197#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Is the current backlash to facebook&#039;s privacy/distribution of information changes and defaults purely rhetorical in nature or is it affecting how you or others use facebook?  

In my case I use it more the more public it becomes. I can now syndicate most of my live feed to an outside reader, TweetDeck, and check it when I check twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the current backlash to facebook&#8217;s privacy/distribution of information changes and defaults purely rhetorical in nature or is it affecting how you or others use facebook?  </p>
<p>In my case I use it more the more public it becomes. I can now syndicate most of my live feed to an outside reader, TweetDeck, and check it when I check twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
