Archive for the ‘Ischool’ Category

Student Blogs on Privacy and Information Law

I am teaching again at Seattle University Law and University of Washington’s Information School again.  Both classes have started publicly blogging over current events and the course subject matter.  The student perspectives are interesting to me as I learn something new as a professor from more then half the posts.

Information Privacy law blog – 2L/3L contributors, strong focus on new technology and privacy torts. Seattle University Law

Social Use of Information – Librarian Student Blog - UW’s Information School

iConference: Information, Values, and the Justice System part 4

iSchools and Law Schools Collaborations w/ Dean Kellye Testy, Dean Mark
Niles
, Mike Crandall

This was a great panel.  The Q&A from the audiance was especially strong:

Q: How do we reframe access to knowledge in the US as a human right?

Q: How do we accredit more people, like librarians, to practice the law on a limited basis?

Q: How do we create more opportunities for joint degree programs?

These are great questions, I hope that the conversation started here helps answer these questions.

Authenticity, Security and Electronic Evidence w/ John McKay, Barbara Endicott
Popovsky

View more presentations from Brian Rowe.
The iSchool also has a blog up for the iConference: ischools.org/iConference11/blog/

iConference Information, Values, and the Justice System part 3

Values Brainstorming:

Who is not currently being served?

Identify who is not being served

What are the accessibility or usability requirements?

Money and Human resources, what do we have?

Who is the Justice System for all? Not just citizens or residence but everyone regardless of background, education, race, language. Absolutely everyone.

ATJ Technology Principles

The Access to Justice Technology Principles were developed by the Access to Justice Board to ensure that technology enhances rather than diminishes access to and the quality of justice for all persons in Washington State. Comments of the Access to Justice Board committee drafters accompanying the Principles make clear the intent that the Principles are to be used so as to be practical and effective for both the workers in and user of the justice system, that the Principles do not create or constitute the basis for new causes of action or create unfunded mandates. These Principles have been endorsed by the Board for Judicial Administration, the Judicial Information System Committee, the Board of Trustees of the Superior Court Judges’ Association, the Board of Governors of the Washington State Bar Association, the Minority and Justice Commission, the Gender and Justice Commission, the Attorney General, and the Council on Public Legal Education.

Summary of each Principle

I. Requirement of Access to Justice: Use of technology must promote, and not reduce, equal access.
Full-text of the first principle.

II. Technology and Just Results: The justice system must use technology to achieve the objective of a just result achieved through a just process and reject, minimize, or modify any use that impairs achieving it.
Full-text of the second principle.

III. Openness and Privacy: Technology in the justice system should be designed and used to meet the dual responsibilities of being open to the public and protecting personal privacy.
Full-text of the third principle.

IV. Assuring a Neutral Forum: The justice system must ensure the existence of neutral, accessible and transparent forums which are compatible with new technologies, and discourage and reduce the demand for the use of those which are not.
Full-text of the fourth principle.

V. Maximizing Public Awareness and Use: The justice system should promote public knowledge and understanding of the tools afforded by technology to access justice.
Full-text of the fifth principle.

VI. Best Practices: Those governed by the principles must use ‘best practices’ to guide their use of technology.
Full-text of the sixth principle.

More information is available at the ATJWeb.org site:

READ the ATJ Tech Principles.
READ the Supreme Court Order that upholds the Principles.

iConference Live Blog: Information, Values, and the Justice System: Transformation and Challenges

The program just opened with a a strong video by Chief Justice Barbara A. Madsen.   Here are the slides for the presentations to follow:

Hon. Don Horowitz:

David Keyes Slides

Brian Rowe:

Related Law review articles Mentioned by Don:

Vol 79 Washington Law Review #1 February 2004 p.77 “Technology, Values and the Justice System: the evolution of the Access to Justice Bill of Rights”

The Wash State ATJ Tech Principles-A Perspective for Justice System Professionals 27 Justice System Jrnl 248 9-28-06 by Zorza-Horowitz A PDF version

MSIM Reading Group: Pull

I just finished attending a Masters of Information Management (MSIM) book group that read Pull: The Power of the Semantic Web to Transform Your Business out at Third Place Books. It was a great conversation about both the MSIM program generally and the future of information systems.

Here are a few of the topic we covered.

Q: What is Pull?

Metadata, Personal Data Lockers, Automation (several of the examples are mere automation but the idea of pull is more then automation)

Q: Is David Siegel a visionary or an Andy Rowney? No answer was agreed upon here.

Q: What are the strong points of the book?

Great ideas, several little slices of what the future could look like.  Several interesting conversation starters, it gives people enough information about topics to launch them into heated discussions over the future.

Q: What are the weakest parts of the book?

Privacy concerns were glossed over with no real solutions presented.
Other books talked about:

Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers Is the New Way to Be Smart, The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations


Cool ideas from the discussion group:

Video on Designing a Stop Sign:

Bonus Photo: While I was at, Third Place Books, I could not help but drool over the Espresso:

Event: Voices from the Rwanda Tribunal: Genocide and Justice

The ISchool and Seattle University School of Law are sponsoring a talk about the Rwanda Genocide Tribunal. Here is the event info:

“Voices from the Rwanda Tribunal: Genocide and Justice”
Date: Tuesday, January 27
Time: 7:00 – 9:00 p.m.
Location: Kane Hall, Room 120 ,University of Washington
Cost: FREE!

To register, visit: https://catalysttools.washington.edu/webq/survey/lhatfiel/66846 or call Natalie Michael at 206-543-4794.

Recent events in Congo, Darfur and Somalia underscore the persistence of genocide as a political, legal, ethical and humanitarian problem. In 1994, the Rwandan genocide lasted only 100 days but left more than 800,000 dead, a rate of killing far higher than any other previous genocide. In response to the Rwandan genocide, the United Nations in 1994 created the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

The presentation will be given by University of Washington Information School Professor Batya Friedman and a team of experts from Seattle University School of Law and UW. “Voices from the Rwanda Tribunal” is part of a UW multi-lifespan research initiative intended to help future generations understand and learn from the Rwanda genocide, develop an improved system of international justice, and contribute to a process of healing and peace. A series of compelling videos will give voice to the judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, administrators, interpreters, investigators, jailers, psychologist and others associated with the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.

Last fall, Friedman and former Superior Court Judge Donald Horowitz led a team of information scientists, legal experts and award-winning cinematographers to Rwanda and Tanzania. The team, which included former State Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Utter; former U.S. Attorney and Seattle University School of Law Professor from Practice John McKay and SU Law Professor Ron Slye, conducted 49 in-depth video interviews with participants in the tribunal. For the first time ever, both the professional and personal experiences of lawyers, judges and others directly involved with such a court or tribunal have been brought together, collected, and preserved. That didn’t happen at Nuremberg on in Cambodia or South Africa. These materials will be made fully available to the public in Rwanda, throughout Africa, and the rest of the world.

I will likely be in attendance and live blogging.

UW Informatics on YouTube

One of the most common questions I receive, is what is Informatics? Informatics for me was the intersections of CSE (computer science and engineering) and HCI (Human computer Interaction) with a little bit of philosophy and ethics thrown in to broaden one’s prospectives.

The most recent Informatics cohort put has put a YouTube to try and explain the major to prospective students:

Brian Reyes, one of the grads talking in the video, did a great Drupal site for WSBA last year it is the ATJWeb.org site. Pass it on to your friends who might be interested in applying to Informatics! The application date is coming up on April 15. And of course, feel free to post it on your social networking pages, etc. (I need to talk to them about putting the video under CC). For more information about Informatics check out the Ischool website.

Ischool Blogs

The Silverfish, a publication of University of Washington’s Ischool, now has a list of Ischool related blogs. The Ischool at UW has done a lot to reach out to Alumni and keep to update best practices as technology changes.

Disclaimer: I am a proud Graduate of the Informatics program of the ISchool and regularly attend events they host such as Kahle’s speech on Access to Knowelge.

Ischool Podcast

The University of Washington’s Ischool has started a podcast! It can be found on the Newsletter page for the Ischool with a convenient RSS feed:

http://www.ischool.washington.edu/events/newsletter.aspx

It is great to see the Ischool reaching out to the community and implementing best practices in the information field in the schools own administration.

I am working with Seattle University Law currently to try and persuade the school of the advantages of podcasting. A podcast focusing on social justice legal issues could be an incredible asset to the legal services community.

Background on the Ischool:

The ISchool is one of UW premier schools with a strong Ph.D program, a Masters in Library Information Science (MLIS), Masters of Science in Information Management (MSIM) and a unique Bachelor of Science in Informatics which consists of tradition Computer Science curriculum paired with cutting edge human-computer interaction and information science research.

My undergrad work was done in the Informatics program and the volunteer organization I now run Freedom for IP , was an out growth my Informatics research capstone.

Return top

Activist & Legal Scholar

Information Technology Geek, Free Culture Activist, Copyright & Patent Reformer, Privacy Wonk, Access to Justice Advocate, Disability Rights Exponent, Public Speaker